The Zimmerli water show as a unit is well-composed. The content was strong and believable.  The concept of water felt very well covered.  There is a nice flow, which keeps with the water theme.  The lighting is dimmer than normal gallery lighting would be.  The color they painted the front introductory was a wise choice as it is a warm enough tone that worked with the golden color lights. The lights and the color of the wall made a strong team to set the mood.  The opening piece, net full of bottled water, was an unusual choice but it is extreme looking enough to also contribute to the mood set by the lights and colored wall.  Also, the pre-existing floor color helped pull these elements together.

                There are a large variety of works displayed, which lends itself to the broad theme of water.  Water as a subject is very complex.  As an artist who works with subjective water regularly, I know that I got a lot out of the show that I will be able to apply to my own ideas. It was sort of like going to the “art doctor”.  Even thought I think the variety in the show is very valuable, there are too many pieces on display.  Things were very close together and a lot of them did not complement each other, which created a lot of visual tension.  For example, a photograph would be hanging in a frame with a glass pane covering it right next to an oil painting.   Combinations such as this look amateurish, like a high school art show where every piece is hung differently.  In addition, I think the presentation led the rooms to feel unbalanced.  I also felt that the arrangement of the pieces could have made more sense.  I was distracted by how different some things looked next to each other.  I feel that there were many pieces that should not have been included at all.  At times I felt that the show included certain pieces simply because they referenced water, not matter the quality or aesthetic value.  I think the curators could have been a bit pickier with what they decided to include.

           The piece in the show that stands out the most to me is the river made out of small nails.  I’ve never seen a piece like this before. It felt very fresh.  The color of the pins lent itself to water very easily.  The liner layout of the pins was very interesting and balanced as well as unpredictable.  The selling point of the piece was the casted shadows on the wall coming from each pin.  I think that is a very strong piece with support from excellent installation. 

                     The second piece I am going to discuss is the installation of blown glass.  This piece is very unusual and clever.  The way the over-sized glass “droplets” bent the light and created glares truly made the scene look like real water.  Water holds color through reflections from the inside and also on the outside.  The glass mimicked this very well, especially in picking up the wall color.  There were also these beautiful reflections on the wall behind the glass pieces that were against it.  This also really lent itself to the way water behaves. 

           

                  The last piece I would like to discuss is the set of three monotone photographs.

I really appreciated these in the show because they really aren’t completely about water.  I feel like they are more about restoration of life through water.  These show how water truly is liquid life and can restore hope in people.  These made me feel quenched, like I was standing right in the falls with the people.  It feels like there is a quiet desperation; a thirstiness that is in process of being relieved.  I can feel the cool water running across my skin.

                This piece I don’t really care to discuss, but I did want to mention it for person reasons.  When I saw this painting, I got so excited because I’ve been there.  This summer I hiked in Scotland for a month straight, and Glen Ellis was one of my landmarks.  This painting captures the essence of that place perfectly…